An Answer To The Question, “Which Of The Following Is Not An Example Of The Potential Dark Side Of The Big Apple?”
Which of the following is not an example of the possible dark side of Big Data? In fact, it’s a perfect example. Police visits to people whom a criminal system identified as more than likely to commit another crime in the near future. The use of a sophisticated device planted in your car to analyze current driving habits. This device could allow police to catch criminals in the act, or even prevent future crimes from occurring.
But in order to understand what we’re talking about, you need to understand what “potential dark side” means. It doesn’t refer to some shadowy side of human nature that automatically applies when evil people get together. Rather, it refers to the potential for abuse of power, whether by a public official or private citizen. And given the enormous resources that are at their disposal, this potential Dark Side has already manifested itself in many instances.
Take the infamous case of the former governor of California Arnold Schwarzenegger. After he was elected, he set about changing the state’s campaign finance laws to favor candidates. After winning the governorship, he appointed people who would help him to abuse their power, and they abused it. Eventually, several high-ranking politicians were convicted of criminal charges arising from campaign finance irregularities.
Now consider what would have happened if the law had been differently written? If Schwarzenegger hadn’t been able to appoint so many people who would benefit from his appointments, the potential dark side of the situation might have been lessened. But the problem is that a politician can always write their own rulebook. The next time a similar situation arises, you as an informed citizen must make sure that the rules you apply to yourself are also applied to the public. Otherwise you could be on the wrong side of history.
Another example of the potential dark side of the big apple is when he is asked to make a decision. Instead of making the best decision for himself, in this instance for the greater good of the state, he often makes decisions based on who will get the most support within his party. Sometimes, his personal feelings come into play. As he puts himself in the shoes of the legislature, he may find that he must move against the wishes of his constituents.
One more example of the potential dark side of the big apple happens when he is asked to make a decision where his feelings about the project are key. He might choose to side with the majority when it comes to the project. At the same time, he may choose to sit down with the minority. Again, he has the opportunity to find the middle ground.
All three of these examples are from a single person’s point of view. When making judgments about others, one should remember that they too have their unique set of circumstances. Their career path might veer towards one direction or the other. Just because they have one example of the potential dark side of the big apple does not mean that every single person who works in politics will cross those lines.
The answer to the question, “which of the following is not an example of the potential dark side of the big apple?” can only be found, once you have identified with each of the three individuals, what it is about them that you find so appealing. What might be a dark spot for one person might not be so for others. Then there will be room for compromise.